Jump to content

Outpost Omega J

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1039

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Outpost Omega J

  1. Outpost Omega J
    First noted on this site as of 10/31/14. (Some what appropriate given the "horror" and "madness" tags.)
  2. Outpost Omega J

    Princess Nightmare

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Otome

    Based upon the above post by Just playing, this game first showed up here on 11/26/2014.
  3. Outpost Omega J

    The Royal Trap

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Otome

    First Noted 10/22/14.
  4. Outpost Omega J
    First Noted 10/22/14.
  5. Outpost Omega J
    If ever there was a valid reason to create Mal-ware, it would be to unleash on the personal computer of the person who wrote the code for that bit of brilliance.
  6. Outpost Omega J
    OMArmy, Not sure what you were trying to accomplish. I can see the {img} tag pair here where I'm "quoting" you and typing this response, but I'm not actually seeing anything in the forum thread, or the preview of THIS post for that matter. I'm not sure if this is only happening to me or if every body is experiencing this. To help with any trouble shooting you care to attempt, I running windows 7 Home Premium and using Fire Fox as my browser.
  7. Outpost Omega J
    I figured out that they changed the captchas to one "word" after clicking refresh twice. I was mocking the fact it was still asking for two however.
  8. Outpost Omega J
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11796[/ATTACH] What TWO words?
  9. Outpost Omega J

    Little Princess

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Eroge

    Is this fan translated or English version?
  10. Outpost Omega J

    Little Princess

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Eroge

    First Noted 10/21/14.
  11. Outpost Omega J
    People, quit voting for choice three. Pasa already cast his vote on "no" (incorrectly I might add as he should have picked choice 3) and so that option should be remaining at 0.
  12. Outpost Omega J
    Avenger, people do have the right to free speech. However, making a statement/expressing an opinion etc. in the hearing of somebody you KNOW will be offended by for no other reason than to offend them, and not because you are have a discussion with somebody else is not invoking your right to freedom of speech. It is being a jack ass. And like I said, the quote in your picture isn't relevant. I've asked everybody who keeps calling me that name derived from a single typo several months ago to stop calling me that. Calling me a name that you know I don't like is not expressing an opinion. It is not covered by free speech. It is being a jack ass. Also, I point this out as a statement of fact only, this thread is posted under "General Discussions and Debates". Here is the only place on the forum I CAN bicker about this. If I posted this thread on one of eroge related sections, you would be well within your right to request this whole thread be deleted.
  13. Outpost Omega J
    The right I mention belongs to everyone by virtue of being born until they do something that forfeits it. The fact of the matter is I should not have had to spell that out. Every thinking person should know that by default. As to "not how the world works", whose fault is that? The world's fault or the fault of the people who live in the world? Most, I grant not all, of society's problems would go away if every body adopted a policy of "You leave me alone, I'll leave you alone." Technically, I could argue the "world", not the people who live in the world, DOES work that way. The world is completely unbiased. When natural disasters strike, the world doesn't target any one in specific. It doesn't care if people are there or not. The natural disaster happens anyways. The "world" is respecting the rights of people not to be deliberately insulted.
  14. Outpost Omega J
    Kinda missed the point with my critique of reporters in the video. I was using the video as an example of how the press usually twists things to a certain perspective and to hell with the truth. I was not trying to prove the vote was or was not rigged. I might also be overly paranoid the of the press and that was a completely unbiased objective report. My purpose was to point out that they needed to provide additional context to their claims so as to prove they are being honest, else everything I said about the report being heavily skewed and biased could be true.
  15. Outpost Omega J
    I'll throw in one more. The reporters themselves in the second video. (I didn't watch the first video so no comment there.) Keep in mind while reading the following I am critiquing the reporter(s) in the second video above. I am making no claims one way or the other as to whether or not the vote was rigged. I do not deny the footage of the vote tampering but the report is missing a few pieces of critical information to make it a "reliable news source". 1. How many votes was that person responsible for counting. 2. How many votes total were collected. 3. How many facilities where collecting votes. 4. How many of the facilities had people caught tampering with the votes. We have two instances of confirmed tampering. The one with the vote counter, and the other with the person actually filling out vote forms. Two out of how many? Two out of Ten? Thirty? Three hundred? It may not even be a full one percent. That does not count as a rigged election, just two disgruntled individuals who are committing a crime. As far as the stacks of votes, only two were discernible in that footage. Even assuming those rubber banded groupings were all "Yes"es, no system is perfect and fool proof. (R&D Motto : You make it idiot proof, we'll make a better idiot!) That could have just been good old fashioned benign human error. With out those facts, I can only conclude that video is sensationalism to generate more viewers (and therefore, more profit), sensationalism to stir the pot because the guy is a jack ass, or somebody with their own agenda trying to distort fact to fiction to serve his own purposes. There might be other possibilities as well but I can't think of them. (As a side note, before the videos with in the video [i.e. the camcorder footage and the broad cast news footage, not the video above] was ever used in a court of law, I believe it should be tested by a neutral third party for potential digital manipulation. I'm not saying it was manipulated, just that in this day and age, it's not that hard for somebody with the right know how.)
  16. Outpost Omega J
    You don't even have to look that far. This example was taken right from this forum.
  17. Outpost Omega J
    (I do not know why the picture is not displaying. It does when I hit "Preview" before actually posting. For those who do not like clicking on links in forums, the picture in question can be found on the sixth post of page one of this thread.) While it's true that: 1. Every person has a right to an opinion (on a side note: an opinion derived from objective fact, not mass-media sensationalism, bigotry, etc.) 2. A second person finding the first person's opinion offensive does not negate the first person's right to have their opinion. It's also, most importantly, true that: 3. No body has the right to deliberately express their opinion in the hearing of those who find that opinion offensive for the sole purpose of offending those people and no other reason. 4. Calling somebody an insulting name for the sole purpose of being insulting after being (POLITELY) asked to stop (MULTIPLE TIMES) has nothing to do with having an opinion so Stephan Fry's quote (the speaker in the picture for those who don't realize who I'm talking about) has nothing to do with this. Your argument is specious.
  18. Outpost Omega J
    The only thing I "want" is a return of the curtsey I've shown EVERYONE on this forum for as long as I can remember. I Have NEVER been deliberately rude for the purpose of bothering somebody else and if I have ever accidentally offended someone, I quickly apologize as soon as it is pointed out to me. I'm sorry you feel being polite does not apply to the internet. Unlike privileges, which must be earned, not being deliberately insulted is a fundamental right to all people that can only be lost by deliberately insulting others who have not already lost this right. The fact that I'm in front of a computer does not change the fact I am a person. As I am a person and have not deliberately insulted anyone who still possesses their right to not be deliberately insulted, I still posses the right to not be deliberately insulted.
  19. Outpost Omega J
    Alfadios, rahrah, as you are not Pasa, you shouldn't be selecting that option.
  20. Outpost Omega J
    Minor error of "you/they" in first post. Now corrected.
  21. Outpost Omega J
    If some one politely asks you to stop doing something they find offensive and rude multiple times and you don't stop, does that make you a jack ass?
  22. Outpost Omega J

    Killer Queen

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Eroge

    Based on previous post, the game first appeared on 10/12/14.
  23. Outpost Omega J

    Kichikuou Rance

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Eroge

    Go away for a few days a new game shows up behind my back. Based on the previous post, this game first showed up no later then 9/30/2014. I first noted this game on 10/2/2014.
  24. Outpost Omega J
    First noted on this site as of 8/27/14.
  25. Outpost Omega J

    Imouto Paradise!

    Outpost Omega J commented on Ivan's download in Eroge

    First Noted on this site as of 8/27/14. (Not to late past midnight local time so you could argue 8/26/14)
×
×
  • Create New...